Skip to Main Content

× Winter Break:
All Library Facilities & Services CLOSED:
Sat-Wed, 12/21-1/1
Enjoy the holiday!


Sherrill Library will be closed from Dec 19 - Jan 13 due to construction.   Services by Appointment: Research Consultations, Library Instruction, Pick Up appointments

Research Methods & Studies

Qualitative Research Examples

Definition:

Case Study Research focuses on the choice of study rather than the methodology. Unlike the other methodologies mentioned here, case studies are not meant to be generalized. Rather they are an in-depth observation and analysis of a specific case for its own sake. Case studies seek to provide as complete and extensive an understanding of a phenomena as possible by a total consideration and description of all variables involved. Though case study research design can consist of quantitative methods, it is largely classified as a qualitative research method due to its overall narrative nature.

Further Reading:

Searching:

Looking for additional readings on or examples of case study research? Click here or the image below for recent resources.

Search for case study evidence within All Search

Bias:

  • Unconscious Bias - is when the researcher intuitively draws on stereotypes to make value judgements without enough knowledge, evidence, understanding or reflection. Unconscious bias can show itself in a whole range of ways including affinity bias, attribution bias and confirmation bias:
  • Affinity Bias - refers to when we display a preference towards individuals or groups who share certain qualities or characteristics with us, or people we like.
  • Confirmation Bias - is when the researcher searches for information or interprets what they see in ways that confirm their preexisting beliefs. We pay specific attention to information or observations that support our views, leading us to pay much more attention to our assumptions and beliefs than what is actually happening in front of them. They may go out of their way to look for evidence to prove their expectations to be true, while at the same time turning a blind eye to the information that challenges their beliefs. Confirmation bias has an influence on how researchers gather information, interpret and recall it. Confirmation bias can also reinforce stereotypes. 
  • Attribution Bias - refers to the errors that a researcher makes when trying to find reasons for their own behaviors and motivations or the behaviors and motivations of others. Attribution bias is about when researchers attribute the cause of an individual’s behavior to their character and not the situation.

 

Further Reading:

Definition:

Focus groups are a form of group interview that capitalizes on communication between research participants in order to generate data. Although group interviews are often used simply as a quick and convenient way to collect data from several people simultaneously, focus groups explicitly use group interaction as part of the method. This means that instead of the researcher asking each person to respond to a question in turn, people are encouraged to talk to one another: asking questions, exchanging anecdotes and commenting on each other's experiences and points of view. The method is particularly useful for exploring people's knowledge and experiences and can be used to examine not only what people think but how they think and why they think that way.

Further Reading:

Searching:

Looking for additional readings on or examples of case study research? Click here or the image below for recent resources.

Searching for Focus Group Research via All Search

Bias:

  • Focus groups may disproportionately represent the opinions of those who are more talkative or quick to answer.
  • Conformity bias - is the tendency to give an opinion that feels socially appropriate. Respondents will often do this to fit in or to not offend anyone. In a focus group, they may go along with what everyone else is saying, even if it is plainly wrong or they simply disagree. leads to group think. 
  • Authority bias - This type of bias describes the tendency to attribute greater accuracy to the opinion of an authority figure, even if that figure is unrelated to the topic under discussion. In focus groups, authority bias can occur when one person asserts their authority or presents themselves as being something of an expert on the subject. This can deter others from speaking up or lead them to agree with whatever is being said. This leads to unbalanced point(s) of view. 

Further Reading:

Definition:

Ethnography is a qualitative method for collecting data often used in the social and behavioral sciences. Data are collected through observations and interviews, which are then used to draw conclusions about how societies and individuals function. 

It is standard practice that a researcher often live among the people they are studying, enabling the ethnographer to effectively conduct their research. This research involves the collection and analysis of relevant data concerning individual societies and cultures such as aspects of:
           • the geography and environment
           • the people's technology and techniques of adaptation
           • food practices
           • their values regarding and institution of marriage, family, politics, folklore, religion
           • economy
           • language structure and use
           • social relationships, practices, and roles

Primary methods for fieldwork include:
           • participant observation
           • interviews
           • note-taking and record-keeping
           • taking photographs/making films
           • collecting artifacts

Further Reading:

Searching:

Looking for additional readings on or examples of ethnographic research? Click the image below or here for a list of relevant resources.

Searching for Ethnographic Evidence in All Search

Bias:

  • Ethnographer Bias may obscure a genuine relationship as produce artifactual correlations. This could be especially true in cases where an ethnographer's theoretical orientation leads him to seriously distorted perceptions and thus to distorted reporting of behavior.
  • Read this study for suggestions mitigating biasETHNOGRAPHY: MITIGATING OBSERVER BIAS (2015)

 

Further Reading:

 

Definition: 

Grounded Theory sets out to discover or construct theory from data, systematically obtained and analyzed using comparative analysis. Grounded theory is a structured, yet flexible methodology. This methodology is appropriate when little is known about a phenomenon; the aim being to produce or construct an explanatory theory that uncovers a process inherent to the substantive area of inquiry. One of the defining characteristics of grounded theory is that it aims to generate theory that is grounded in the data.

Further Reading:

Searching:

Looking for additional readings on or examples of grounded theory research? Click on the image below or here for relevant resources.

Searching for Grounded Theory in All Search

Bias:

  • Grounded theory methods tend to produce large amounts of data, often difficult to manage.
  • There are no standard rules to follow for the identification of categories

 

Further Reading:

Definition:

Narrative research (or narrative inquiry) is the study of written or oral accounts to understand experience and the way in which people make meaning of their lives. This methodology places emphasis and value in the not only the knowledge that a person or persons may possess, but in they themselves and their ways of sharing or expressing that knowledge. Prominent in fields such as cognitive science, organizational studies, knowledge theory, sociology, occupational science, and education studies, narrative research exists in the realm of knowledge and information management.

This methodology uses a number of artifacts such as:
           • autobiographies
           • journal writing
           • field notes
           • letters
           • conversation
           • research interview
           • stories passed down across generations of family members
           • documents
           • photographs, memory boxes, and other personal-family-social artifacts
           • life experience

Further Reading

Searching:

Looking for additional readings on or examples of narrative research? Click the image below or here for a list of relevant resources.

 

Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2004). Narrative inquiry: experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco, Calif. : Jossey-Bass, 2004.
Ingraham, C. (2015). Narrative. In K. Tracy (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. Retrieved from http://ezproxyles.flo.org/login?url=https://search.credoreference.com/content/entry/wileylasi/narrative/0?institutionId=1429

Bias: 

Personal accounts or narratives can contain bias because the way we perceive the world is filtered through our personal beliefs, wants, and experiences. Bias might also occur when what is depicted is a story or account that the researcher wants to display in order to present a certain impression or conclusion.

Further Reading:

Definition:

Phenomenological Research seeks to understand and describe the universal essence of a phenomenon. The approach investigates the everyday experiences of human beings while suspending the researchers’ preconceived assumptions about the phenomenon. Phenomenological Research is similar to narrative research in that the emphasis of the research lies in the experience. How it differs is that narrative research is not interested in the experience itself per se, but rather the mode and manner in which people make sense of that experience. Phenomenological research, on the other hand, keeps its focus on the experience itself, regardless of the method in which the meaning is extracted from it. Phenomenological research recognizes that people are instrumental in extracting meaning from the experience, but remains generally less concerned with the type of data used.

Further Reading

Searching:

Looking for additional readings on or examples of phenomenological research? Click on the image below or here for relevant resources.

 

Stein, J. Y. (2016). Narrative Research vs. Phenomenological Research [Online Forum Comment]. Message posted to https://www.researchgate.net/post/Narrative_Research_vs_Phenomenological_Research

Bias:

  • Selection bias can occur during the process of recruiting individuals to participate in a study.
  • Data collection is another major area where bias can infiltrate the research process. Conducting interviews, even using a structured questionnaire, can easily be influenced by the personal characteristics of the researcher, including inflections in voice, the order of the questions, and subjects’ desire to please the one collecting the data. Observational data are particularly at risk of bias because how one person views a situation may be completely different from how another sees the same situation. Since data collection for phenomenological research occurs through interviews, bias may easily distort the findings through the personal relationship that develops between the researcher and the participant. In order to allow participants to tell their stories, intimacy is requisite and the researcher needs to be in the moment and allow the story to flow. Leading the participants to say what they think the researcher wants to hear is always problematic. It can occur through probing questions, facial expressions, and body language, which are more powerful means of communication than just words. 
  • Analysis of the data collected from interviewing participants can be easily influenced by bias since the researcher is the one who must sort through all of the information and come to conclusions that include themes, theories, or descriptions. It is easy when searching through all of the words to find only those that support what the researcher thinks is happening and to dismiss things that do not fit into a preconceived schema.

Further Reading: